Why Is The Paris Agreement Failing

Although Trump was the only world leader to withdraw from the deal, all the leaders of the world`s largest and most advanced economies are failing. The countries that have benefited the most from greenhouse gas emissions have brought the world together to tackle this common problem, but it should also be up to them to make the biggest concessions, especially if they are waiting for recognition of their green diplomatic initiatives. Kyoto Protocol, 2005. The Kyoto Protocol, adopted in 1997 and entered into force in 2005 [PDF], was the first legally binding climate agreement. It required developed countries to reduce their emissions by an average of 5 per cent compared to 1990 levels and to set up a system to monitor countries` progress. But the treaty did not force developing countries, including major carbon emitters China and India, to act. The United States signed the agreement in 1998, but never ratified it and then withdrew its signature. On the other hand, there is a high probability that when this agreement enters into force in 2020, we will have exceeded the emission level that will keep us below 1.5°C, and that the geopolitical reality of the climate will be shaped by the most powerful countries. But this international process is not the only solution.

We must not allow our governments to take up this global challenge alone, and we must all act at all levels to ensure a genuine ecological and socially just transition everywhere and in all sectors! President Donald Trump was the first and only world leader to withdraw from this international agreement on June 1, 2017. Its unilateral decision has put one of the world`s largest emitters of greenhouse gases out of its global commitment. But the United States will not be the only country to abandon the planet. Among the world`s largest and most advanced economies, not a single country will fulfill the Mission of the Paris Agreement to prevent warming of more than 1.5 degrees by the end of the century. The Paris Agreement brings with it a major historic change. This is due to its universality, which applies to all nations. It is also because the agreement clearly shows all stakeholders that the world is moving towards a paradigm that takes into account the reality of the fight against climate change. This is already reflected in the stock markets – already in the days following the adoption of this agreement, movements in the stock markets have shown a shift from fossil fuels to renewables. Although this agreement is weak and has many shortcomings, it is the best result we can expect from all the governments of this planet. This is far from perfect and sufficient to fight climate change, but it is a good step forward. Nicholas Stern, the climate economist, embraced Xia Zhenhua, the normally reserved Chinese minister, as screams and screams echoed throughout the room.

“I felt that the Paris Agreement was the moment when the world decided that it really had to deal with climate change seriously,” he said. “We were all there together, people noticed.” Net-zero emissions derive from the Paris Agreement, although the target has not been explicitly stated in the text of the treaty […].