商业杂志《 福布斯》总编辑史帝夫 福布斯(Steve Forbes)在这项排行榜当中,位居第三。
Hillary spent 200 million heavily in the presidential election failed, as in recent years, the most “expensive” defeat, February 3, 2012, want to compete for the U.S. presidency, have spent huge amounts of money to fight the psychological preparation of the elections.
On the 3rd, “Central News Agency reported that U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, 2008 presidential election, spent 2.5066 billion U.S. dollars in the end, playing with toys, 2000, to date, the most expensive” defeat “the U.S. presidential election.
Investment in the party primaries to participate in the U.S. presidential election, this long political road, a step-by-step business needs to have strong financial, as a support backing. Regardless of campaign marketing materials, or the overhead of a huge election team, add up, costs are quite substantial.
Still participate in the Republican party primaries, major presidential candidates, for example, just won the Florida primary victory, former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney, or former U.S. House Speaker Newt Gingrich, and former Penn Senator Santo Salem, Texas Congressman Paul, statistics show: 4 people’s campaign, which this party primaries, have respectively spent tens of millions of dollars in astronomical overhead.
The dust settles, when the election results did not win the victory of candidates during the campaign, like the “burn” all of the various spending all like to go down the drain.
ABC (ABC), according to the declaration of election expenses of the U.S. Federal Election Commission figures, summary of the past 10 years, spent the most money, the results unsatisfying victory and defeat, “U.S. presidential candidate example, in the first place, in competing for the presidency in 2008, Hillary.
Had to have the title of U.S. First Lady Hillary Clinton as a Democratic senator from New York, 2001, 2008, intends to challenge the presidency, put the Democratic primary. During the party primaries, she spent a total of 2.5066 billion U.S. dollars, and finally lost to rival Barack Obama later successfully elected President of the United States.
According to statistics, as of June 2008, the Clinton election camp liabilities payments, accumulated up to $ 22.5 million, a record over the years – the maximum liability which the record in the U.S. presidential election candidates.
Hillary Clinton during the election period, out-of-pocket, the name of loans, $ 13.2 million individual deposit money to pay to her election team. After the election, in order to reduce the debt service pressure of the campaign team, this debt write off elimination.
Romney, in 2008, to participate in the Republican party primaries, has spent 1.1360 billion U.S. dollars, have been thwarted, so he became the second rank after Hillary, the most expensive of the “lost” the U.S. presidential election candidates.
As of the end of 2011, according to statistics of the U.S. Federal Election Commission announced on the 1st, Romney comeback in which the Republican party primaries, spending more than about 3720 million dollars in overhead.
Romney, the ability to do so, squeeze under other challenges opponents in the party’s nomination battle, one by one, on behalf of Republican against Obama, came under scrutiny.
The business magazine “Forbes” editor-in-chief Steve Forbes (Steve Forbes) in the list which ranked third.
In 2000, Forbes spent more than 8600 million dollars, to participate in the Republican party primaries, but unfortunately, in the states primaries performance, are not good enough, even had not won any state primaries.
Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, in 2008, spent more than 6500 million U.S. dollars, to participate in the Republican party primaries lost, making of them in this list, the name of the fourth.
Arizona Republican Senator John McCain, ranking No. 5. McCain, in 2000 at a cost of more than 5800 million U.S. dollars to compete for the Republican party nomination battle, and finally, lost to George W. Bush was later elected President of the United States.
According to statistics, up to date in early March 2000, McCain – announced its withdrawal from the election, when the election of George W. Bush camp to spend only about the McCain camp spent half the battle.
上述文件展示了-目前,领先的美国共和党总统提名参选人罗姆尼,在竞选中,“威力十足”的原因，他受到名为“重建我们的未来”(Restore Our Future)的“超级政治行动委员会”支持，主要通过投放广告,对抗主要对手金里奇。
“超级政治行动委员会”,从根本上,改变了竞选方式，对竞选产生了巨大影响。如果参选者能够找到愿意出巨资的资助人，“可能产生令人难以置信的影响，”前密歇根州共和党主席安努兹斯(Saul Anuzis)称。“民主21”(Democracy 21)总裁维特海默(Fred Wertheimer)指出，“超级政治行动委员会,令一少部分富豪,能够对选举,产生非常大的影响”。
A small number of tycoons on the U.S. presidential election affect the “huge”
February 2, 2012, British media reported late Tuesday (January 31), documents submitted to the U.S. Federal Election Commission, 2011 “super political action committee” to raise a total of more than $ 42 million to support the U.S. Republican presidential campaign, which shows the new donor requirements, allow a few of America’s wealthiest impact on the election.
Reuters reported that in 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court decision, the political action committee donations, no ceiling. February 1, submit the above documents, revealing the influence of the requirement.
The above file shows – Currently, the leading U.S. Republican presidential nominee candidate Mitt Romney during the campaign, “full power” reasons, he was called “rebuild our future” (Restore Our Future) “super-political Action Committee support, primarily through advertising, against the main rival Gingrich.
“Super political action committee, in 2011, raised $ 30 million by the end of the bank account, nearly $ 24 million. In the past month, the organization in Florida to spend a lot of money advertising “attack” Gingrich. Is widely believed that the ads, Romney made Tuesday’s primary election victory.
Compared with Romney’s political action committee has funds to support other Republican candidates and support Obama’s political action committee, are dwarfed. Obama’s “priority” (Priorities USA) institutions last year, raised $ 4.2 million as of December 31, bank accounts, $ 1.5 million.
“Super political action committee, fundamentally changed the campaign mode, had a tremendous impact on the campaign. If the candidates are able to find a sponsor willing to pay huge sums of money, “may produce incredible,” former Michigan Republican main 席安努兹斯 (Saul Anuzis) said. “Democracy” (Democracy, 21), president of Witte AD (Fred Wertheimer,) pointed out that the “super political action committee, so that a small part of the rich, resulting in a very big impact on the election”.
Corrado (Anthony Corrado., A campaign finance expert at Colby College) pointed out: “The most simple view, the role of the super political action committee, so that the past, candidates may be eliminated because of insufficient resources to continue the fight go on.” .