🍀陈斯红🍀轉發:微博 詩姐八 到美國最高法院網站 supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx 發了下面一段話: 如果你是美國公民或美國綠卡居民,你都可以隨時上美國最高法院網站留言,以表達你的要求和意見,這是美式上訪。 美國網友們可以跟著我這樣做,無論 唐納德 川普總統是否贏得美利堅合眾國總統大選,美國最高法院必須下令調查、審判重點,搞清楚,美國總統大選中是否有選舉作弊? 同時,美國最高法院應該判決美國民主黨州長們是否能利用美國當地法院的左派法官們臨時更改美國總統大選的競選法; 還是堅持美國的州的競選法必須由美國的州議院立法通過,才有效? 美國總統大選前,美國民主黨在搖擺州起訴美國的州競選法律300多次,希望通過美國左派法官們判決,臨時更改美國的州的競選美國總統的法律,有些案件成功了,例如,賓州,把接受郵寄選票日期推遲大選日之後的幾天。 但是,那是不對的。 美國任何競選美國總統法律的更改,必須由美國的州議院通過法律,才能成為法律,法官們應該根據美國法律判案,不應該改變美國各級政府的法律。 奇怪的是,在美國深藍州,例如,夏威夷,美國民主黨知道: 喬 拜登一定會贏得美國總統位置。 美國總統大選前,並沒有像在美國搖擺州打官司,試圖改變11月3日截止郵寄選票的法律。 可見,美國民主黨早有預謀,它們改變美國搖擺州的美國總統大選的規則。 Weibo Shijie Ba went to the U.S. Supreme Court website supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx and posted the following paragraph: If you are a U.S. citizen or U.S. green card resident, you can leave a message on the website of the U.S. Supreme Court at any time to express your requirements and opinions. This is an American petition. U.S. netizens can follow me. Whether or not President Donald Trump wins the presidential election of the United States of America, the U.S. Supreme Court must order an investigation and trial focus to find out whether there is election cheating in the U.S. presidential election. At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court should decide whether the U.S. Democratic governors can use the leftist judges of the U.S. local courts to temporarily change the election law of the U.S. presidential election; Or insist that the election laws of the states in the United States must be passed by the U.S. State Houses to be effective? Before the US presidential election, the US Democratic Party sued the US state election laws in swing states for more than 300 times, hoping to temporarily change the US state’s election laws for the US president through a ruling by the American leftist judges. Some cases succeeded , such as Pennsylvania Postpone the date of receiving ballots by mail a few days after the election day. But that is not right. Any changes to the laws of the United States running for the president of the United States must be passed by the US State House before it can become law. Judges should judge cases in accordance with US laws and should not change the laws of all levels of government in the United States. Strangely, in the deep blue states of the United States, for example, Hawaii, the U.S. Democratic Party knows that Joe Biden will definitely win the US presidential position. Before the U.S. presidential election, there was no attempt to change the law on November 3 that ended the mailing of votes in a lawsuit in a swing state in the United States. It can be seen that the Democratic Party of the United States has planned for a long time, and they changed the rules of the US presidential election in swing states in the United States. . “Please order the investigation and recount on the swing states: Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. All votes that received after November 3rd should not be counted, voters’ signatures must match. Also, the recount must be done by hand, not by machine. No one should rig the election without consent of their state legislature. Thank you!” 谷歌翻譯

🍀陈斯红🍀轉發

微博 詩姐八 到美國最高法院網站 supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx 發了下面一段話:
如果你是美國公民或美國綠卡居民,你都可以隨時上美國最高法院網站留言,以表達你的要求和意見,這是美式上訪。
美國網友們可以跟著我這樣做,無論 唐納德 川普總統是否贏得美利堅合眾國總統大選,美國最高法院必須下令調查、審判重點,搞清楚,美國總統大選中是否有選舉作弊?
同時,美國最高法院應該判決美國民主黨州長們是否能利用美國當地法院的左派法官們臨時更改美國總統大選的競選法;
還是堅持美國的州的競選法必須由美國的州議院立法通過,才有效?

美國總統大選前,美國民主黨在搖擺州起訴美國的州競選法律300多次,希望通過美國左派法官們判決,臨時更改美國的州的競選美國總統的法律,有些案件成功了,例如,賓州,把接受郵寄選票日期推遲大選日之後的幾天。

但是,那是不對的。
美國任何競選美國總統法律的更改,必須由美國的州議院通過法律,才能成為法律,法官們應該根據美國法律判案,不應該改變美國各級政府的法律。

奇怪的是,在美國深藍州,例如,夏威夷,美國民主黨知道: 喬 拜登一定會贏得美國總統位置。
美國總統大選前,並沒有像在美國搖擺州打官司,試圖改變11月3日截止郵寄選票的法律。
可見,美國民主黨早有預謀,它們改變美國搖擺州的美國總統大選的規則。

Weibo Shijie Ba went to the U.S. Supreme Court website supremecourt.gov/contact/contact_pio.aspx and posted the following paragraph:
If you are a U.S. citizen or U.S. green card resident, you can leave a message on the website of the U.S. Supreme Court at any time to express your requirements and opinions. This is an American petition.
U.S. netizens can follow me. Whether or not President Donald Trump wins the presidential election of the United States of America, the U.S. Supreme Court must order an investigation and trial focus to find out whether there is election cheating in the U.S. presidential election.
At the same time, the U.S. Supreme Court should decide whether the U.S. Democratic governors can use the leftist judges of the U.S. local courts to temporarily change the election law of the U.S. presidential election;
Or insist that the election laws of the states in the United States must be passed by the U.S. State Houses to be effective?

Before the US presidential election, the US Democratic Party sued the US state election laws in swing states for more than 300 times, hoping to temporarily change the US state’s election laws for the US president through a ruling by the American leftist judges. Some cases succeeded , such as Pennsylvania Postpone the date of receiving ballots by mail a few days after the election day.

But that is not right.
Any changes to the laws of the United States running for the president of the United States must be passed by the US State House before it can become law. Judges should judge cases in accordance with US laws and should not change the laws of all levels of government in the United States.

Strangely, in the deep blue states of the United States, for example, Hawaii, the U.S. Democratic Party knows that Joe Biden will definitely win the US presidential position.
Before the U.S. presidential election, there was no attempt to change the law on November 3 that ended the mailing of votes in a lawsuit in a swing state in the United States.
It can be seen that the Democratic Party of the United States has planned for a long time, and they changed the rules of the US presidential election in swing states in the United States.

.

“Please order the investigation and recount on the swing states: Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. All votes that received after November 3rd should not be counted, voters’ signatures must match. Also, the recount must be done by hand, not by machine.
No one should rig the election without consent of their state legislature.
Thank you!”

谷歌翻譯