美國共和黨人對推特公司互聯網憤怒 推特臉書等社交媒體的一些行為激起了美利堅合眾國共和黨參議員們的憤怒。 如果傑克·多爾西下週在美國參議院作證,這名推特首席執行官將有機會消除其公司對有關亨特·拜登文章的笨拙處理所造成的一些政治損害。 亨特·拜登是美國民主黨總統候選人喬·拜登之子。 在推特決定限制《紐約郵報》一篇揭露喬 拜登父子的文章後,美國參議員們將於20日投票決定是否向多爾西發出傳票。 推特聲稱,該文章違反了其有關竊取材料和假新聞的政策。 美國官員們預計,美國共和黨佔多數派的參議院可能還會向臉書網站首席執行官馬克·扎克伯格發傳票,因為,臉書公司對這篇文章設置了限制。 美國參議院聽證會已經定於23日舉行,屆時,美國共和黨參議員們將有機會表達他們對整個互聯網行業的憤怒,因為,美國矽谷企業採取了一系列激怒美國右翼人士的舉措。 華盛頓“燈塔”政策諮詢公司研究分析師薩姆·麥高恩說:“這次,美國國會聽證會實際上是為了發出聲音。 美國所有這些參議員們都希望:他們質問傑克·多爾西的視頻傳開,這樣,他們就能在競選材料裡加以利用,激勵他們的支持者。 ” 多爾西必須解釋為什麼推特公司決定封禁《紐約郵報》的報導——甚至需要解釋為什麼暫時封禁唐納德 特朗普總統的競選團隊賬號及白宮新聞秘書凱莉·麥克納尼的賬號。 這場爭端加劇了 美國共和黨對社交媒體公司的憤怒。 此前幾週,該行業比以往任何時候都更嚴格地限制偽虛假信息,尤其是來自美國右翼的偽虛假信息。 今年夏天,推特給 唐納德 特朗普總統的一些推文貼上了警示標籤,他們稱,他違反了有關美國總統選舉虛假信息、新冠病毒謊言和煽動暴力的政策,從而激怒了他。 作為回應,美國資深共和黨人再次開始談論第230條,即1996年的美國一項法律的條款。 該條款規定,社交媒體平台無需為用戶、用戶們發布的內容負法律責任。 一些分析人士認為,像臉書公司和推特公司這樣的美國互聯網公司目前正在對錯誤信息採取更激進的行動,因為,它們認為,與美國總統唐納德特朗普連任相比,潛在的喬拜登政府是更加現實的威脅。因為,美國資深民主黨人感興趣的是: 通過隱私監管法和改革反壟斷法,以便更容易挑戰美國矽谷的企業權力。 9月29日在美國弗吉尼亞州阿靈頓拍攝的視頻畫面顯示,美國總統 唐納德 特朗普與美國民主黨總統候選人 喬 拜登在俄亥俄州克利夫蘭市參加2020年美國總統候選人首場電視辯論。 谷歌翻譯 Měiguó gònghé dǎng rén duì tuī tè gōngsī hùliánwǎng fènnù tuī tè liǎn shū děng shèjiāo méitǐ de yīxiē xíngwéi jī qǐle měilìjiān hézhòngguó gònghé dǎng shēn yìyuánmen de fènnù. Rúguǒ jiékè·duō ěr xī xià zhōu zài měiguó cānyìyuàn zuòzhèng, zhè míng tuī tè shǒuxí zhíxíng guān jiāng yǒu jīhuì xiāochú qí gōngsī duì yǒuguān hēng tè·bài dēng wénzhāng de bènzhuō chǔlǐ suǒ zàochéng de yīxiē zhèngzhì sǔnhài. Hēng tè·bài dēng shì měiguó mínzhǔ dǎng zǒngtǒng hòuxuǎn rén qiáo·bài dēng zhīzǐ. Zài tuī tè juédìng xiànzhì “niǔyuē yóu bào” yī piān jiēlù qiáo bài dēng fùzǐ de wénzhāng hòu, měiguó cān yìyuánmen jiāng yú 20 rì tóupiào juédìng shìfǒu xiàng duō ěr xī fāchū chuánpiào. Tuī tè shēngchēng, gāi wénzhāng wéifǎnle qí yǒuguān qièqǔ cáiliào hé jiǎ xīnwén de zhèngcè. Měiguó guānyuánmen yùjì, měiguó gònghé dǎng zhàn duōshù pài de cānyìyuàn kěnéng hái huì xiàng liǎn shū wǎngzhàn shǒuxí zhíxíng guān mǎkè·zhā kè bó gé fā chuánpiào, yīnwèi, liǎn shū gōngsī duì zhè piān wénzhāng shèzhìle xiànzhì. Měiguó cānyìyuàn tīngzhèng huì yǐjīng dìng yú 23 rì jǔxíng, jièshí, měiguó gònghé dǎng shēn yìyuánmen jiāng yǒu jīhuì biǎodá tāmen duì zhěnggè hùliánwǎng hángyè de fènnù, yīnwèi, měiguó guīgǔ qǐyè cǎiqǔle yī xìliè jīnù měiguó yòuyì rénshì dì jǔcuò. Huáshèngdùn “dēngtǎ” zhèngcè zīxún gōngsī yánjiū fēnxī shī sà mǔ·mài gāo ēn shuō:“Zhècì, měiguó guóhuì tīngzhèng huì shíjì shang shì wèile fāchū shēngyīn. Měiguó suǒyǒu zhèxiē cān yìyuánmen dōu xīwàng: Tāmen zhìwèn jiékè·duō ěr xī de shìpín chuán kāi, zhèyàng, tāmen jiù néng zài jìngxuǎn cáiliào lǐ jiāyǐ lìyòng, jīlì tāmen de zhīchí zhě. ” Duō ěr xī bìxū jiěshì wèishéme tuī tè gōngsī juédìng fēngjìn “niǔyuē yóu bào” de bàodǎo——shènzhì xūyào jiěshì wèishéme zhànshí fēngjìn tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ zǒngtǒng de jìngxuǎn tuánduì zhànghào jí báigōng xīnwén mìshū kǎi lì·màikè nà ní de zhànghào. Zhè chǎng zhēngduān jiājùle měiguó gònghé dǎng duì shèjiāo méitǐ gōngsī de fènnù. Cǐqián jǐ zhōu, gāi hángyè bǐ yǐwǎng rènhé shíhòu dōu gèng yángé de xiànzhì wěi xūjiǎ xìnxī, yóuqí shì láizì měiguó yòuyì de wěi xūjiǎ xìnxī. Jīnnián xiàtiān, tuī tè gěi tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ zǒngtǒng de yīxiē tuī wén tiē shàngle jǐngshì biāoqiān, tāmen chēng, tā wéifǎnle yǒuguān měiguó zǒngtǒng xuǎnjǔ xūjiǎ xìnxī, xīnguān bìngdú huǎngyán hé shāndòng bàolì de zhèngcè, cóng’ér jīnùle tā. Zuòwéi huíyīng, měiguó zīshēn gònghé dǎng rén zàicì kāishǐ tánlùn dì 230 tiáo, jí 1996 nián dì měiguó yī xiàng fǎlǜ de tiáokuǎn. Gāi tiáokuǎn guīdìng, shèjiāo méitǐ píngtái wúxū wèi yònghù, yònghùmen fābù de nèiróng fù fǎlǜ zérèn. Yīxiē fēnxī rénshì rènwéi, xiàng liǎn shū gōngsī hé tuī tè gōngsī zhèyàng dì měiguó hùliánwǎng gōngsī mùqián zhèngzài duì cuòwù xìnxī cǎiqǔ gèng jījìn de xíngdòng, yīnwèi, tāmen rènwéi, yǔ měiguó zǒngtǒng tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ liánrèn xiāng bǐ, qiánzài de qiáo bài dēng zhèngfǔ shì gèngjiā xiànshí de wēixié. Yīnwèi, měiguó zīshēn mínzhǔ dǎng rén gǎn xìngqù de shì: Tōngguò yǐnsī jiānguǎn fǎ hé gǎigé fǎn lǒngduàn fǎ, yǐbiàn gèng róngyì tiǎozhàn měiguó guīgǔ de qǐyè quánlì. 9 Yuè 29 rì zài měiguó fújíníyǎ zhōu ā líng dùn pāishè de shìpín huàmiàn xiǎnshì, měiguó zǒngtǒng tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ yǔ měiguó mínzhǔ dǎng zǒngtǒng hòuxuǎn rén qiáo bài dēng zài éhài’é zhōu kèlìfūlán shì cānjiā 2020 nián měiguó zǒngtǒng hòuxuǎn rén shǒu chǎng diànshì biànlùn. Gǔgē fānyì 展开U.S. Republicans are angry at Twitter Inc. Internet Some actions on social media such as Twitter and Facebook aroused the anger of the Republican senators of the United States of America. If Jack Dorsey testifies in the U.S. Senate next week, the Twitter chief executive will have the opportunity to remove some of the political damage caused by his company’s clumsy handling of articles about Hunter Biden. Hunter Biden is the son of US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden. After Twitter decided to restrict an article in the New York Post that exposed Joe Biden and his son, US senators will vote on the 20th whether to issue a subpoena to Dorsey. Twitter claimed that the article violated its policy on theft of materials and fake news. U.S. officials predict that the U.S. Republican-majority Senate may also issue a subpoena to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg because of Facebook’s restrictions on this article. The U.S. Senate hearing is scheduled to be held on the 23rd. At that time, U.S. Republican senators will have the opportunity to express their anger towards the entire Internet industry because Silicon Valley companies in the United States have taken a series of measures to anger American right-wingers. Sam McGowan, a research analyst at the Washington “Beacon” policy consulting firm, said: “This time, the U.S. Congressional hearing is actually to give a voice. All these U.S. senators hope that the video of them questioning Jack Dorsey will be spread so that they can use it in their campaign materials to inspire their supporters. ” Dorsey must explain why Twitter decided to block the New York Post’s coverage—even why it temporarily blocked the account of President Donald Trump’s campaign team and the account of White House press secretary Kelly McNerney. This dispute intensified the anger of the US Republican Party against social media companies. In the previous few weeks, the industry restricted false and false information more strictly than ever, especially from the right-wing in the United States. This summer, Twitter put a warning label on some of President Donald Trump’s tweets, saying that he violated the policy of false information about the US presidential election, new crown virus lies and incitement to violence, thus angering him. In response, senior U.S. Republicans once again began to talk about Article 230, which is the provisions of a 1996 American law. This clause stipulates that social media platforms do not need to be legally responsible for users and content posted by users. Some analysts believe that American Internet companies such as Facebook and Twitter are currently taking more aggressive action against misinformation because they believe that the potential Joe Biden is compared to the re-election of US President Donald Trump. The government is a more realistic threat. Because senior Democrats in the United States are interested in: Through privacy supervision laws and reform of antitrust laws, it is easier to challenge corporate power in Silicon Valley. A video shot in Arlington, Virginia, USA on September 29 showed that US President Donald Trump and US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden participated in the first TV debate of the 2020 US presidential candidates in Cleveland, Ohio. Google Translate

美國共和黨人對推特公司互聯網憤怒

推特臉書等社交媒體的一些行為激起了美利堅合眾國共和黨參議員們的憤怒。

如果傑克·多爾西下週在美國參議院作證,這名推特首席執行官將有機會消除其公司對有關亨特·拜登文章的笨拙處理所造成的一些政治損害。
亨特·拜登是美國民主黨總統候選人喬·拜登之子。
在推特決定限制《紐約郵報》一篇揭露喬 拜登父子的文章後,美國參議員們將於20日投票決定是否向多爾西發出傳票。
推特聲稱,該文章違反了其有關竊取材料和假新聞的政策。
美國官員們預計,美國共和黨佔多數派的參議院可能還會向臉書網站首席執行官馬克·扎克伯格發傳票,因為,臉書公司對這篇文章設置了限制。

美國參議院聽證會已經定於23日舉行,屆時,美國共和黨參議員們將有機會表達他們對整個互聯網行業的憤怒,因為,美國矽谷企業採取了一系列激怒美國右翼人士的舉措。
華盛頓“燈塔”政策諮詢公司研究分析師薩姆·麥高恩說:“這次,美國國會聽證會實際上是為了發出聲音。
美國所有這些參議員們都希望:他們質問傑克·多爾西的視頻傳開,這樣,他們就能在競選材料裡加以利用,激勵他們的支持者。 ”
多爾西必須解釋為什麼推特公司決定封禁《紐約郵報》的報導——甚至需要解釋為什麼暫時封禁唐納德 特朗普總統的競選團隊賬號及白宮新聞秘書凱莉·麥克納尼的賬號。
這場爭端加劇了 美國共和黨對社交媒體公司的憤怒。
此前幾週,該行業比以往任何時候都更嚴格地限制偽虛假信息,尤其是來自美國右翼的偽虛假信息。
今年夏天,推特給 唐納德 特朗普總統的一些推文貼上了警示標籤,他們稱,他違反了有關美國總統選舉虛假信息、新冠病毒謊言和煽動暴力的政策,從而激怒了他。
作為回應,美國資深共和黨人再次開始談論第230條,即1996年的美國一項法律的條款。
該條款規定,社交媒體平台無需為用戶、用戶們發布的內容負法律責任。
一些分析人士認為,像臉書公司和推特公司這樣的美國互聯網公司目前正在對錯誤信息採取更激進的行動,因為,它們認為,與美國總統唐納德特朗普連任相比,潛在的喬拜登政府是更加現實的威脅。因為,美國資深民主黨人感興趣的是:
通過隱私監管法和改革反壟斷法,以便更容易挑戰美國矽谷的企業權力。

9月29日在美國弗吉尼亞州阿靈頓拍攝的視頻畫面顯示,美國總統 唐納德 特朗普與美國民主黨總統候選人 喬 拜登在俄亥俄州克利夫蘭市參加2020年美國總統候選人首場電視辯論。

谷歌翻譯
Měiguó gònghé dǎng rén duì tuī tè gōngsī hùliánwǎng fènnù

tuī tè liǎn shū děng shèjiāo méitǐ de yīxiē xíngwéi jī qǐle měilìjiān hézhòngguó gònghé dǎng shēn yìyuánmen de fènnù.

Rúguǒ jiékè·duō ěr xī xià zhōu zài měiguó cānyìyuàn zuòzhèng, zhè míng tuī tè shǒuxí zhíxíng guān jiāng yǒu jīhuì xiāochú qí gōngsī duì yǒuguān hēng tè·bài dēng wénzhāng de bènzhuō chǔlǐ suǒ zàochéng de yīxiē zhèngzhì sǔnhài.
Hēng tè·bài dēng shì měiguó mínzhǔ dǎng zǒngtǒng hòuxuǎn rén qiáo·bài dēng zhīzǐ.
Zài tuī tè juédìng xiànzhì “niǔyuē yóu bào” yī piān jiēlù qiáo bài dēng fùzǐ de wénzhāng hòu, měiguó cān yìyuánmen jiāng yú 20 rì tóupiào juédìng shìfǒu xiàng duō ěr xī fāchū chuánpiào.
Tuī tè shēngchēng, gāi wénzhāng wéifǎnle qí yǒuguān qièqǔ cáiliào hé jiǎ xīnwén de zhèngcè.
Měiguó guānyuánmen yùjì, měiguó gònghé dǎng zhàn duōshù pài de cānyìyuàn kěnéng hái huì xiàng liǎn shū wǎngzhàn shǒuxí zhíxíng guān mǎkè·zhā kè bó gé fā chuánpiào, yīnwèi, liǎn shū gōngsī duì zhè piān wénzhāng shèzhìle xiànzhì.

Měiguó cānyìyuàn tīngzhèng huì yǐjīng dìng yú 23 rì jǔxíng, jièshí, měiguó gònghé dǎng shēn yìyuánmen jiāng yǒu jīhuì biǎodá tāmen duì zhěnggè hùliánwǎng hángyè de fènnù, yīnwèi, měiguó guīgǔ qǐyè cǎiqǔle yī xìliè jīnù měiguó yòuyì rénshì dì jǔcuò.
Huáshèngdùn “dēngtǎ” zhèngcè zīxún gōngsī yánjiū fēnxī shī sà mǔ·mài gāo ēn shuō:“Zhècì, měiguó guóhuì tīngzhèng huì shíjì shang shì wèile fāchū shēngyīn.
Měiguó suǒyǒu zhèxiē cān yìyuánmen dōu xīwàng: Tāmen zhìwèn jiékè·duō ěr xī de shìpín chuán kāi, zhèyàng, tāmen jiù néng zài jìngxuǎn cáiliào lǐ jiāyǐ lìyòng, jīlì tāmen de zhīchí zhě. ”
Duō ěr xī bìxū jiěshì wèishéme tuī tè gōngsī juédìng fēngjìn “niǔyuē yóu bào” de bàodǎo——shènzhì xūyào jiěshì wèishéme zhànshí fēngjìn tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ zǒngtǒng de jìngxuǎn tuánduì zhànghào jí báigōng xīnwén mìshū kǎi lì·màikè nà ní de zhànghào.
Zhè chǎng zhēngduān jiājùle měiguó gònghé dǎng duì shèjiāo méitǐ gōngsī de fènnù.
Cǐqián jǐ zhōu, gāi hángyè bǐ yǐwǎng rènhé shíhòu dōu gèng yángé de xiànzhì wěi xūjiǎ xìnxī, yóuqí shì láizì měiguó yòuyì de wěi xūjiǎ xìnxī.
Jīnnián xiàtiān, tuī tè gěi tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ zǒngtǒng de yīxiē tuī wén tiē shàngle jǐngshì biāoqiān, tāmen chēng, tā wéifǎnle yǒuguān měiguó zǒngtǒng xuǎnjǔ xūjiǎ xìnxī, xīnguān bìngdú huǎngyán hé shāndòng bàolì de zhèngcè, cóng’ér jīnùle tā.
Zuòwéi huíyīng, měiguó zīshēn gònghé dǎng rén zàicì kāishǐ tánlùn dì 230 tiáo, jí 1996 nián dì měiguó yī xiàng fǎlǜ de tiáokuǎn.
Gāi tiáokuǎn guīdìng, shèjiāo méitǐ píngtái wúxū wèi yònghù, yònghùmen fābù de nèiróng fù fǎlǜ zérèn.
Yīxiē fēnxī rénshì rènwéi, xiàng liǎn shū gōngsī hé tuī tè gōngsī zhèyàng dì měiguó hùliánwǎng gōngsī mùqián zhèngzài duì cuòwù xìnxī cǎiqǔ gèng jījìn de xíngdòng, yīnwèi, tāmen rènwéi, yǔ měiguó zǒngtǒng tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ liánrèn xiāng bǐ, qiánzài de qiáo bài dēng zhèngfǔ shì gèngjiā xiànshí de wēixié. Yīnwèi, měiguó zīshēn mínzhǔ dǎng rén gǎn xìngqù de shì:
Tōngguò yǐnsī jiānguǎn fǎ hé gǎigé fǎn lǒngduàn fǎ, yǐbiàn gèng róngyì tiǎozhàn měiguó guīgǔ de qǐyè quánlì.

9 Yuè 29 rì zài měiguó fújíníyǎ zhōu ā líng dùn pāishè de shìpín huàmiàn xiǎnshì, měiguó zǒngtǒng tángnàdé tè lǎng pǔ yǔ měiguó mínzhǔ dǎng zǒngtǒng hòuxuǎn rén qiáo bài dēng zài éhài’é zhōu kèlìfūlán shì cānjiā 2020 nián měiguó zǒngtǒng hòuxuǎn rén shǒu chǎng diànshì biànlùn.

Gǔgē fānyì
展开

U.S. Republicans are angry at Twitter Inc. Internet

Some actions on social media such as Twitter and Facebook aroused the anger of the Republican senators of the United States of America.

If Jack Dorsey testifies in the U.S. Senate next week, the Twitter chief executive will have the opportunity to remove some of the political damage caused by his company’s clumsy handling of articles about Hunter Biden.
Hunter Biden is the son of US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.
After Twitter decided to restrict an article in the New York Post that exposed Joe Biden and his son, US senators will vote on the 20th whether to issue a subpoena to Dorsey.
Twitter claimed that the article violated its policy on theft of materials and fake news.
U.S. officials predict that the U.S. Republican-majority Senate may also issue a subpoena to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg because of Facebook’s restrictions on this article.

The U.S. Senate hearing is scheduled to be held on the 23rd. At that time, U.S. Republican senators will have the opportunity to express their anger towards the entire Internet industry because Silicon Valley companies in the United States have taken a series of measures to anger American right-wingers.
Sam McGowan, a research analyst at the Washington “Beacon” policy consulting firm, said: “This time, the U.S. Congressional hearing is actually to give a voice.
All these U.S. senators hope that the video of them questioning Jack Dorsey will be spread so that they can use it in their campaign materials to inspire their supporters. ”
Dorsey must explain why Twitter decided to block the New York Post’s coverage—even why it temporarily blocked the account of President Donald Trump’s campaign team and the account of White House press secretary Kelly McNerney.
This dispute intensified the anger of the US Republican Party against social media companies.
In the previous few weeks, the industry restricted false and false information more strictly than ever, especially from the right-wing in the United States.
This summer, Twitter put a warning label on some of President Donald Trump’s tweets, saying that he violated the policy of false information about the US presidential election, new crown virus lies and incitement to violence, thus angering him.
In response, senior U.S. Republicans once again began to talk about Article 230, which is the provisions of a 1996 American law.
This clause stipulates that social media platforms do not need to be legally responsible for users and content posted by users.
Some analysts believe that American Internet companies such as Facebook and Twitter are currently taking more aggressive action against misinformation because they believe that the potential Joe Biden is compared to the re-election of US President Donald Trump. The government is a more realistic threat. Because senior Democrats in the United States are interested in:
Through privacy supervision laws and reform of antitrust laws, it is easier to challenge corporate power in Silicon Valley.

A video shot in Arlington, Virginia, USA on September 29 showed that US President Donald Trump and US Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden participated in the first TV debate of the 2020 US presidential candidates in Cleveland, Ohio.

Google Translate