[Donald Trump on Twitter; Donald Trump on Twitter] What if major US Internet technology companies insist on cooperating with the pseudo-mainstream media in the US? We must immediately revoke the protection for them under Article 230 of the (United States of America) Communications Regulations Act. When the US government granted these protections, they created huge monsters! U.S. President Donald Trump stated that after Twitter and Facebook censored a harshly worded report on Hunter Biden’s so-called e-mail by the New York Post, the Biden family had been criticized by large technology companies. protection”. “He and his family were dishonest. They were caught. Now they are being protected by large technology companies,” Trump told North Carolina people at the Pete Greenville Airport. He said: “We must immediately remove the 230 clause protection for these technology giants.” Article 230 of the 1996 Communications Standards Act stipulates: “Any provider or user of interactive computer services shall not be regarded as the publisher or spokesperson of any information provided by other information content providers.” This part has played a key role in the rise of today’s social media giants. It allows Internet service providers-as well as Google, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc.-to be exempt from liability for content published by third parties on their platforms . But some right-wing critics believe that if tech giants censor conservative views, including Trump’s controversial posts, they should no longer benefit from Section 230 protection. When talking about the responsibility protection of social media platforms, Trump said: “Years ago, large technology companies got something that made them large technology companies. We have to take away their 230 clauses unless they perform well. ” “Believe it or not, the Democrats agree with this,” Trump continued. Democrats on Capitol Hill threatened to break up large technology companies, questioning whether these companies violated US antitrust laws and stole information from competitors. On Wednesday, the “Washington Post” published a report containing an email they obtained from a whistleblower. The email stated that Biden’s son introduced Biden, the then Vice President, to an executive of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas company. Less than a year ago, the Trump administration pressured Ukrainian government officials to fire the prosecutor Victor Shokin who was investigating the company. According to the owner of a repair shop in Biden’s hometown of Delaware, the emails were found in data stored on computers. Isaac, the owner of the store, said that he cannot be 100% sure that this customer is Hunter Biden, but this customer has taken a laptop from the store in the future. He said that he contacted the FBI out of concerns about the contents of the computer. Isaac told the Washington Post that he thought it was Hunter Biden’s laptop because it had stickers from the Bo Biden Foundation, which was named after his late brother.【唐納德 川普總統推特 ;唐納德 特朗普總統推特】 如果美國互聯網大科技公司堅持與美國偽主流媒體們合作? 我們就必須立即撤銷《(美利堅合眾國)通信規範法》第230條對他們的保護。 當美國政府授予這些保護後,他們創造了一個個巨型的怪物! 美國總統唐納德特朗普表示,在推特和臉書審查了《紐約郵報》關於亨特·拜登所謂的電子郵件的一篇措辭嚴厲的報導後,拜登家族受到了大型科技公司的“保護”。 “他和他的家人不誠實,他們被抓住了。現在他們正受到大型科技公司的保護,”特朗普在皮特-格林維爾機場對北卡羅萊納人說。 他說:“我們必須立即取消對這些科技巨頭的230條款保護。” 1996年《通信規範法》第230條規定:“任何交互式計算機服務的提供者或用戶都不應被視為其他信息內容提供者所提供的任何信息的發布者或發言人。” 這個部分在當今社交媒體巨頭的崛起中起到了關鍵作用,它允許互聯網服務提供商——還有谷歌、推特、臉書、YouTube等——免受第三方在其平台上發布的內容的責任。但一些右翼批評人士認為,如果科技巨頭審查保守觀點,包括特朗普有爭議的帖子,它們就不應該再受益於第230條款的保護。 特朗普在談到社交媒體平台的責任保護時說:“多年前,大型科技公司得到了一些東西,讓它們成為了大型科技公司。我們要把他們的230條款拿走,除非他們表現好。 ” “信不信由你,民主黨人同意這一點,”特朗普繼續說道。國會山的民主黨人威脅要拆分大型科技公司,質疑這些公司是否違反了美國反壟斷法,並竊取了競爭對手的信息。 週三,《華盛頓郵報》公佈了一份報告,內容是他們從一名告密者那裡獲得的電子郵件。該郵件稱,拜登的兒子將時任副總統的拜登介紹給烏克蘭天然氣公司Burisma Holdings的一名高管。不到一年前,特朗普政府向烏克蘭政府官員施壓,要求他們解僱正在調查該公司的檢察官維克托·肖金。 據拜登家鄉特拉華州一家修理店的店主說,這些電子郵件是在存放在電腦中的數據裡被發現的。店老闆艾薩克說,他不能百分之百確定這名顧客是亨特•拜登,但這位顧客從未來過店裡取過筆記本電腦。他說,出於對電腦內容的擔憂,他聯繫了FBI。 艾薩克告訴《華盛頓郵報》,他認為這是亨特·拜登的筆記本電腦,因為筆記本上有博·拜登基金會的貼紙,該基金會以他已故的哥哥的名字命名。

[Donald Trump on Twitter; Donald Trump on Twitter]

What if major US Internet technology companies insist on cooperating with the pseudo-mainstream media in the US?
We must immediately revoke the protection for them under Article 230 of the (United States of America) Communications Regulations Act.
When the US government granted these protections, they created huge monsters!

U.S. President Donald Trump stated that after Twitter and Facebook censored a harshly worded report on Hunter Biden’s so-called e-mail by the New York Post, the Biden family had been criticized by large technology companies. protection”.
“He and his family were dishonest. They were caught. Now they are being protected by large technology companies,” Trump told North Carolina people at the Pete Greenville Airport.
He said: “We must immediately remove the 230 clause protection for these technology giants.”
Article 230 of the 1996 Communications Standards Act stipulates: “Any provider or user of interactive computer services shall not be regarded as the publisher or spokesperson of any information provided by other information content providers.”
This part has played a key role in the rise of today’s social media giants. It allows Internet service providers-as well as Google, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc.-to be exempt from liability for content published by third parties on their platforms . But some right-wing critics believe that if tech giants censor conservative views, including Trump’s controversial posts, they should no longer benefit from Section 230 protection.

When talking about the responsibility protection of social media platforms, Trump said: “Years ago, large technology companies got something that made them large technology companies. We have to take away their 230 clauses unless they perform well. ”
“Believe it or not, the Democrats agree with this,” Trump continued. Democrats on Capitol Hill threatened to break up large technology companies, questioning whether these companies violated US antitrust laws and stole information from competitors.

On Wednesday, the “Washington Post” published a report containing an email they obtained from a whistleblower. The email stated that Biden’s son introduced Biden, the then Vice President, to an executive of Burisma Holdings, a Ukrainian gas company. Less than a year ago, the Trump administration pressured Ukrainian government officials to fire the prosecutor Victor Shokin who was investigating the company.
According to the owner of a repair shop in Biden’s hometown of Delaware, the emails were found in data stored on computers. Isaac, the owner of the store, said that he cannot be 100% sure that this customer is Hunter Biden, but this customer has taken a laptop from the store in the future. He said that he contacted the FBI out of concerns about the contents of the computer.
Isaac told the Washington Post that he thought it was Hunter Biden’s laptop because it had stickers from the Bo Biden Foundation, which was named after his late brother.

【唐納德 川普總統推特 ;唐納德 特朗普總統推特】

如果美國互聯網大科技公司堅持與美國偽主流媒體們合作?
我們就必須立即撤銷《(美利堅合眾國)通信規範法》第230條對他們的保護。
當美國政府授予這些保護後,他們創造了一個個巨型的怪物!

美國總統唐納德特朗普表示,在推特和臉書審查了《紐約郵報》關於亨特·拜登所謂的電子郵件的一篇措辭嚴厲的報導後,拜登家族受到了大型科技公司的“保護”。
“他和他的家人不誠實,他們被抓住了。現在他們正受到大型科技公司的保護,”特朗普在皮特-格林維爾機場對北卡羅萊納人說。
他說:“我們必須立即取消對這些科技巨頭的230條款保護。”
1996年《通信規範法》第230條規定:“任何交互式計算機服務的提供者或用戶都不應被視為其他信息內容提供者所提供的任何信息的發布者或發言人。”
這個部分在當今社交媒體巨頭的崛起中起到了關鍵作用,它允許互聯網服務提供商——還有谷歌、推特、臉書、YouTube等——免受第三方在其平台上發布的內容的責任。但一些右翼批評人士認為,如果科技巨頭審查保守觀點,包括特朗普有爭議的帖子,它們就不應該再受益於第230條款的保護。

特朗普在談到社交媒體平台的責任保護時說:“多年前,大型科技公司得到了一些東西,讓它們成為了大型科技公司。我們要把他們的230條款拿走,除非他們表現好。 ”
“信不信由你,民主黨人同意這一點,”特朗普繼續說道。國會山的民主黨人威脅要拆分大型科技公司,質疑這些公司是否違反了美國反壟斷法,並竊取了競爭對手的信息。

週三,《華盛頓郵報》公佈了一份報告,內容是他們從一名告密者那裡獲得的電子郵件。該郵件稱,拜登的兒子將時任副總統的拜登介紹給烏克蘭天然氣公司Burisma Holdings的一名高管。不到一年前,特朗普政府向烏克蘭政府官員施壓,要求他們解僱正在調查該公司的檢察官維克托·肖金。
據拜登家鄉特拉華州一家修理店的店主說,這些電子郵件是在存放在電腦中的數據裡被發現的。店老闆艾薩克說,他不能百分之百確定這名顧客是亨特•拜登,但這位顧客從未來過店裡取過筆記本電腦。他說,出於對電腦內容的擔憂,他聯繫了FBI。
艾薩克告訴《華盛頓郵報》,他認為這是亨特·拜登的筆記本電腦,因為筆記本上有博·拜登基金會的貼紙,該基金會以他已故的哥哥的名字命名。